Search This Blog

Loading...

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Clement X'Plor USH: Final Review

Clement X'Plor USH: 35mm wide
The Clement USH tire is one of the three sets of tires sent out to me in the spring of this year. You can check out the introductory post here. I have already posted my MSO review, which you can check out here.

The Clement tire has a unique look compared to the MSO. The raised center section is flanked by groups of pyramid shaped micro-knobs that might be best described as a file tread on steroids.



Tubed up look.
Clement rates this tire as a 35mm wide tire, and set up with tubes on narrow-ish road rims, I measured the tires as being at 33.2mm @ 50psi. The wheels were then put to a lot of commuting use and some gravel roads.

On paved roads and commutes, the high crown and pronounced center section made for fast rolling, but a tendency to feel quick off center of the handle bar into turns, which could catch you by surprise. Cut resistance seems to be really good. I was able to run these through plenty of trash and broken up glass debris with no flatting issues, and no major damage to the tire casings at all.

Out on the gravel, the tubed set up on the narrower rims proved to be a handful. Only on the best, smoothest gravel roads would I have wanted these on my rig. The stiffness of the casings with tubes inside and the narrow, higher crowned profile conspired to make the USH feel skittish and required a bunch of corrective moves in the chunkier stuff which has typified the gravel around here of late.

Switched wheels and went tubeless.
Wheel Change And Tubeless Set Up: So with the set up on gravel not to my liking, I swapped the tires over to some new, U.S.A. made A-23 rims, built up by Velocity U.S.A. These rims are wider than what I had the USH's on before at 23mm outside width. This helped reduce the crowning effect, flattening out the tire a bit. But the big difference here is that I set the tires up tubeless by utilizing Velocity's tubeless kit, (tape, valve stems), and my own sealant. Set up tubeless, I reduced the air pressures to 40psi front, and about 43psi rear.

The tires were now so different as to be almost like a different tire completely from before. The ride was super smooth, confidence inspiring, and stable on pavement. The "quick" feel off center going into turns was now completely gone. I suppose I should also point out that the wider rims probably help tremendously here as well. Finally- a technical data point- The USH ended up being 35.7mm wide set up tubeless on the A-23.

On gravel, the two personalities of the tire tubed to tubeless continued. I saw much less deflection issues, which made the tire far easier to keep pointed straight in the chunkier gravel. Cornering improved, and overall vibration damping was increased by a wide margin.  The USH was a different tire tubeless than before, no doubt about it.

NOTE: The Clement USH is not a tubeless rated tire. Setting up the Clement X'Plor USH tires tubeless is done so at your own risk and voids all warranties.

All right- with that put out there, I can not fathom why I personally would not run the USH tubeless. The difference in performance is so great that the benefits can not be denied. I also would suggest that a rim of a similar width to the A-23 should strongly be considered for use with this tire, as it mitigates the high crowning effect narrow rims have on the USH, which I feel detracted from its potential performance.

The X'Plor USH tires on the A-23 Velocity wheels
Conclusion: The USH started out as a tire I was not very excited about. Tubed it was stiff, narrow, and on narrow rims, it exhibited a high crown which was all right on paved roads, but not very good on gravel.

However; once I took the risk to set it up tubeless on the tubeless rated A-23 rims, (again- not recommended by Clement),  I found a different tire. A tire that was supple, stable, comfortable, and performed at a much higher level than before.

So, with the MSO and USH, which would I go with? That's a great question. Clement has come out with two versatile, intriguing tires for gravel aficionados. My answer would be this: "Where will you be riding next?" Rougher tracks, fresher gravel, or wetter conditions would call out for the wider, more voluminous MSO. Faster, smoother, drier conditions seem to be more in favor of the USH. Your weight, load on the bike, and riding style also play into the decision. But if you choose the USH, and stick it on a wider rim, I think you may find a tire that excels on a lot of gravel, and shines just as brightly on pavement. Plus- it will fit almost any cross bike with its 35mm width, which isn't the case with the MSO. (Until Clement widens the sizing choices, which they have indicated they may do in the future.) 

Note: Clement sent these tires for evaluation and review at no charge. I am not being bribed, nor paid to give my opinions and thoughts on these tires. I will strive to give my honest thoughts and opinions throughout this evaluation.

8 comments:

Wilson said...

Excellent review.
Thanks for being so thorough.

Magnetic said...

Not a fan of the new Clement tires after using them for the last two seasons on the gravel and CX circuit. Gave them a chance since they're so heavily marketed to our kind, but they have what I would call a "cheap" ride quality at any pressure, any model. Much better tires out there from other manufactures, IMHO.

scitti said...

Nice piece. I'm riding Conti Travel Contacts and am more than pleased.

The Los said...

I'm a bit late to the game, but thanks for the review. I'm considering these for the upcoming Oregon Stampede and Bear Lake Monster Cross. My CX set up is the PDX tubeless on A23s, so I look forward to giving the USH a lot of dirt road miles this summer!

MATT SAVAGE said...

So, do you have a long term report on this tire? How has the wear been? Any issues with the tubeless set up at this point?

Thanks! Nice review!

Guitar Ted said...

@Matt Savage: I tried setting up the USH tubeless and was successful at that by September and just before Interbike, (late September), I had to park that wheel set for awhile to focus on another project.

It still holds air to this day, but I haven't had much riding time with it since. I am in the process of setting up another gravel rig to allow for the testing of more product in a timely manner. That will happen when the weather breaks here, and I plan on running the USH's quite frequently then. As of now I have one bike that works for many of these products and it has limited me to a degree.

Ed K said...

Question about tire pressure - you mention 40 and 43. Is this for gravel only rides or combination gravel/paved? How about on paved only rides? I just picked up a set of these and getting them mounted today - tubless on a set of the Iron Cross wheels for myh Felt F65x. I've got some road rides coming up but also have a 50+ mile paved and gravel ride next month :)

Thanks for your review on these tires.
Ed

Guitar Ted said...

@Ed K: Never considered raising pressures for pavement, although I ride plenty of it for commutes and partial sections on gravel routes, getting to rides, etc. Never felt that it ever once slowed me down.

I did try these at slightly higher pressures which were no faster, just less comfortable.